With Love to Muhammad (sa) - The Khatam-un-Nabiyyin — Page 168
168 With Love to Muhammad sa the Kh ā tam-un-Nabiyy ī n and no messenger’ means, ‘there can be no one with a (new) law after me. ’” 166 Therefore, it can be concluded that both Hazrat Ibn ‘Arab ī rh and Hazrat Im ā m Shi‘r ā n ī rh did not believe in the absolute end of prophets based on the statement “there is no prophet after me” and it can also be concluded, without doubt, that the Messiah for the Latter Days would be a prophet of All ā h! The Status of the Promised Messiah as At the end of his chapter, Farhan Khan criticizes the writings of the Promised Messiah as by saying, “If by zill and buruz, [Hazrat Mirz ā Ghul ā m] Ahmad [ as ] was referring to the type of nab ī detailed by Ibn ‘Arab ī rh , then the only difference between Ibn ‘Arab ī [ rh ] and what Ahmad[ as ] wrote is semantic. . . . If this is the case, then this is not a special status nor one special glory or honor beyond the other awliya. ’” 167 This is yet another ridiculous argument! As we asked earlier, Farhan Khan should first explain this: What will be the status of the nubuwwah of the Promised Messiah as of the Latter Days? Will he be a prophet with a special status and special glory beyond the other Awliy ā ’ or not? If he says “no,” then this is against the following statements of the Holy Prophet Muhammad sa : 166 Al-Yaw ā q ī t wal Jaw ā hir , Volume 2, Page 42 167 Khan, With Love , Page 40