With Love to Muhammad (sa) - The Khatam-un-Nabiyyin — Page 144
144 With Love to Muhammad sa the Kh ā tam-un-Nabiyy ī n ا a اF a ر\َّeFا a eKا a BاdFراد a ِ َۃ]ْMِ َّرXFا a اF a ِ باWِّeFبۃ a ﻻdDَل اaFَاcَGۃِ. a اXFَّراLِع a Gن a ٰ ZَG a َ Gَع a ِ َّۃMَِّدdَُحdْFا Hence, the purpose here is to refer to the completion with a comparison of the Muhammadan shar ī ‘ah with what has passed from the complete shar ī ‘ahs (of past Prophets). No matter how much Farhan Khan tries to throw dust in the eyes of the reader, the conclusion drawn by Im ā m Ibn Hajar rh is exactly the same as the conclusion drawn by Ahmad ī Muslims. In fact, he even disagrees with the above statement of Im ā m Ibn Hajar rh when he writes, “However, the Had ī th itself speaks about Prophets, not laws. ” 139 Fourth, Farhan Khan writes, “the Ahmad ī [Muslims] quote Ibn Khald ū n in his great work Al-Muqaddimah. Yet they selectively leave out the part of the excerpt that goes against their beliefs. ” 140 This is not true! The way that Ibn Khald ū n understood the had ī th is exactly the same as the way Ahmad ī Muslims understand it. Here is a look at the original Arabic quotation of Ibn Khald ū n: a و a اFبieان a اcdDت a حت a باcFبeہ a اeFبiiن a خاتم a M_Wرون اF a G]eاہ اaFاcGۃ a اeFبوۃ a Fہ a حcYت a اFذی a eب 141 139 Ibid. , Page 14 140 Ibid. 141 See Original pdf at: http://www. al-mostafa. info/data/arabic/depot/gap. php?file=001092-www. al- mostafa. com. pdf [ خcدون، a ابن a G`دGہ a اFحZرG a خcدون a بن a Gحdد a بن a اFرحdٰن a @بد a _حہ a. ۲۶۱ ], Page 261