Haqiqatul-Wahi (The Philosophy of Divine Revelation) — Page 449
POSTSCRIPT SIGN NUMBER 160 449 Mirza Sahib said that this revelation was subject to interpre- tation and that it did not contain his name and, [with] great emphasis claimed that I shall never be vouchsafed a revelation mentioning him by name. Both the revelations mentioned above were received in the month of Safar. When Mirzā's answer came, thereafter, in the month of Safar, I received the revelation during the sleep مرزا صاحب فرعون i. e. Mirza Sahib [is] the Pharaoh. Allah be praised for this, now Mirzā's claim is falsified too and Mirza Sahib reached his aim. When I had received the first revelation, as soon as I woke up, the interpretation crossed my mind that the Pharaoh is Mirza Sahib and Hāmān is Noor Deen. It was a duty on my part, in the interest of all the Muslims, to inform them about it: Letter of 'Abdur- Rahman Muhy-ud-Din بہن توں بھی حق کہن دے اُتے اک بنھیں بھر اوا اہل نفاق بلائیں بریاں لوکاں دین بھلاوا O Brother, you too now gird up your loins to speak the truth; For, hypocrites are an evil visitation and mislead the people. The servant, 'Abdur-Rahman Muhy-ud-Din of Lakhukay Signed in his own hand on 21 Rabiʻul-Awwal 1312 Hijrah This is the letter of Maulawi ‘Abdur-Rahman Muhy-ud-Din and was returned, after it was copied, to my Honourable Maulawi Hakeem Noor Deen. He will keep it safe; and whoever wishes may see it. In this 'revelation' he has designated me, in his opinion, as 'Pharaoh' confidence in me and would think well of me and would later turn away and deny me. This description applies very well to Maulawi Muhammad Husain of Batala who declared such confidence in me in his review of Barahin-e- Ahmadiyya that he was ready to sacrifice his parents for my sake. (Author)