Extreme Lies and Verdicts of Disbelief Against the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at — Page 9
A Review of the Pakistani Government’s “White Paper”: Qadiyaniyyat—A Grave Threat to Islam [ 9 ] to make their position credible. They say that Ahmad i s in their bo oks a ddress th ose wh o do not belie ve in Ahmadiyyat as k a fir. But when we call them k a fir , they start protesting and defaming us in the world; while based upon their claim, it was natural and logical for us to call Ahmad i s k a fir. The second argument that they present is that not only do Ahmad i s call them k a fir , but also have severed all rela- tion with the Muslim ummah ; since Ahmad i s have already cut off all civil, cultural, and religious relationships by themselves, and have separated from the Muslim ummah, why should they be offended when they are thrown out of it? According to them, since Ahmad i s have already broken all relations with other Muslims it is no crime to separate them. At surface, this seems to be a valid argument, but when we analyze it in detail, it will become increasingly clearer that the situation is quite different from what they portray. The Truth About the Verdict of Kufr by the Ahmadiyyah Muslim Jam a ‘at To begin with, it is a totally false accusation that the Ahmadiyyah Muslim Jam a ‘at was the first in issuing an edict kufr [disbelief ]. This issue was also raised in the lifetime of the Promised Messiah as. He answered it as following: