A Critical Review of the Pamphlet, 'Fateh-e-Qadian'

by Hadi Ali Chaudhary

Page 75 of 171

A Critical Review of the Pamphlet, 'Fateh-e-Qadian' — Page 75

REVIVAL of Islam LiEs in PROVING the Death of Jesus 75 word will have no meaning except ‘to lift to the Heavens’. ( F a te h - e-Qadian , p. 13) The author, Musht a q Chishti, did not cite any example or precedent according to the rules of grammar that he mentions. All he has stated is the grammar of the verse of the Holy Quran 44. One can not present a verse as a claim and then present the same verse as its proof. Neither is he able to cite a single example to support his claim nor can he prove, till the Day of Judgement, that the word ‘Heavens’ occurs in this verse. The Holy Quran has no mention of ascension towards the Heaven. The height of his deception is that he has concocted something himself, yet he is attributing it to the Holy Quran. Then, we also have to wonder where ‘Heaven’ is and in which direction? As long as we do not fix the direction of God, how will a physical body move towards Him? The fact is that neither can his argument be proven from the Holy Quran — since it is against its tenor — nor will we find any example outside the Holy Quran that would support his argument. When one holds a belief according to the true intent of the Holy Quran, the Holy Quran also supports him and supporting examples can be found in abundance outside the Holy Quran. We are confident that our opponents cannot produce a single example to back the above mentioned principles of grammar. We produce here an example against this interpretation which they will not be able to counter. In his book M a Thabata Bissunnat i f i Ayy a mis-Sunnah , which is one of the fundamental books of the beliefs of Musht a q 44 S u rah an-Nis a ’ 4:159 [Publishers]