A Critical Review of the Pamphlet, 'Fateh-e-Qadian' — Page 64
64 A critical Review of the Pamphlet—‘f a te h -e-Qadian’ Therefore, when the Promised Messiah as said that the boy talked twice in the belly, it was not a physical conversation. He had previously stated it clearly: The soul of that boy spoke to me under divine direction. In accordance with what the spirit of the boy said that: ا ا ِ ا و ا That is: My time has now arrived. I shall fall upon the earth from Allah and from His hands and then shall proceed towards Him. His birth and his death is a clear proof of the truth of this revelation, which God sent down on the Promised Messiah as , as a narrative from the soul of the child. As far as the linking of this is concerned, In view of the complete text of the Promised Messiah as , the parallel between the speech of the boy in the belly and the speech of Jesus [ Hadrat ‘ I s a as ] becomes crystal clear. It has no other purpose except to show that as the speech of Jesus [ Hadrat ‘ I s a as ] in his cradle was from the wondrous powers of God, similarly the speech of the soul of the boy before his birth was a manifestation of the amazing powers of the same wondrous God. Beyond that, you cannot ascribe any other meaning to it, because Jesus [ Hadrat ‘ I s a as ] spoke with his physical tongue, whilst, as the Promised Messiah as says, ‘The soul of that boy spoke to me under divine direction and I heard his words as revelation. ’ The accusation made by Maulav i Musht a q Ahmad against the Promised Messiah as , in his own words is that: