The Criterion for Religions — Page 15
15 the occasion of Baba Nanak Sahib's demise. No ad- versary ever accused them of such trickery nor did they have to resort to deception. Nor, for that matter, did anyone cry out-like the Jews had done in the case of Jesusas_that the corpse had been stolen. It would have been more plausible if Christians had held such a belief about Baba Nanak Sahib rather than Jesus. To hold such a belief about Jesus is a plain concoction and reeks of fabrication. The one last excuse, which is offered for the suffer- ing and crucifixion of Jesus, is that, being 'God', he was crucified so that his death might redeem the sin- ners. The possibility that God too can die is yet another invention of the Christians, even though they brought him back to life and raised him to the Throne. To this day they are under the false notion that he will come back to this world to sit in judgement, and that the body he was given after his death shall remain with him forever by virtue of being 'God'. But this 'God' incarnate of the Christians, who, according to them, has tasted death once already, and is made up of blood, flesh, bones and all the other organs, is no different from Avatars of the Hindus who are being gleefully disowned by the Aryas nowadays. The only difference is that while the Christian 'God' was born only once from the womb of Mary, daughter of Jacob, the Hindu god Vishnu, with a view to warding off the