Ahmadiyyat or Qadianism! Islam or Apostasy? — Page 311
Does this not indicate that the adversaries of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam. Ahmad are themselves not thoroughly committed to their own concept of the finality of prophethood? Otherwise what conceivable reason could they have for complimenting Elijah Muhammed as being the first standard bearer of Islam in America inspite of his claim to be an apostle of. God Almighty after the chronological finality of the prophethood of our beloved lord and master, Hazrat Muhammed Mustapha, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. . The adversaries of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community may well argue that Elijah Muhammed: 'specifically confined his prophethood for black Americans only," '96 but could one ask them if the Traditions they cite in support of their belief in the finality of prophethood make allowances for a national prophet for a particular people within the broader spectrum of. Islam?. The anti Ahmadiyya elements handling of the entire issue of prophethood; their expectation of the advent of Isa ibne Mariam, upon whom be peace, as a prophet of God after the advent of the Khataman. Nabiyeen, Hazrat Muhammed Mustapha, peace and blessingsof Allah be upon him, and their admission of Elijah Muhammed's claim to be a national prophet are all evidences not only of their failure to grasp the true significance of the Arabic phrase Khataman Nabiyeen, but also of their ingrained bias and hostility towards Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of. Qadian since his claims as the Mujaddid, the Imam Mehdi, the Promised. Messiah and an apostle of God Almighty threaten not only their position and status in society but their monetary welfare also. They have, however, through this display of hostility, exposed themselves considerably and given sufficient evidence of their dishonesty, hypocrisy and bigotry. . PRECEDENT IN HISTORY. However, these adversaries of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad may 96. Ibid 312