Ahmadiyyat or Qadianism! Islam or Apostasy? — Page 98
dissident leadership, was elected the supreme leader of the Ahmadiyya. Muslim Community. . How could the evidence of such a prejudiced witness be considered admissible escapes the intelligence of every rational human being. . ILYAS BURNEY'S QADIANI MAZHAB. Another principal source of reference cited by the contentious anti. Ahmadiyya mullahs appears to be Ilyas Burney's manual of fabrications against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, the 'Qadiani Mazhab. '22. Infact, when studied closely, it appears that the authors of all these publications have based their entire case on the evidence of this one single book upon which they admit, they have relied substantially. 23. What one fails to understand is why these pseudo scholars find it necessary to cite other opponents of the Ahmadiyya Muslim. Community in evidence, when they profess to have launched upon an intellectual journey and personally surveyed every stage of the Ahmadiyya. Muslim Movement's progress and development from the beginning. ' 24 Why do these pretentious scholars need to rely upon the prejudiced and false evidence of other antagonists when they claim to have personally 'delved deep into the writings of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani himself and through this first hand source, arrived at their unprejudiced conclusions. ' 25. Why do they have to 'rely substantially' 26 on, and 'draw copiously' 27 from the books written by other pseudo ulemma of the anti Ahmadiyya fraternity when they themselves not only claim to have personally made an extensive and scholarly study of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Movement's 22. Nadwi, A:A: Qadianism. A Critical Study: pp 19/57/58/59/60/63/71/93/95/97/108 etc. etc 23. Zaheer, E. E: Qadiyaniat. An Analytical Survey: pg 15 24. Nadwi, A. H: Qadianism. A Critical Study: Preface VII 26. Zaheer, E. E. Qadiyaniat. An Analytical Survey: pg 15 98 25. Ibid 27. Ibid: pg 16