Ahmadiyyat or Qadianism! Islam or Apostasy? — Page 96
11. July, 1913. One is rather surprised as to how an Ahmadiyya Muslim journal Al Hakam, which happened to be the official organ of the. Jamaat e Ahmadiyya at that point in time make such an error as to state that the founder of the Community wrote an article for the Paigham e. Sulh when the newspaper itself had not yet been conceived? Does this not suggest that such an error could only have been made by someone who was thoroughly ignorant of the history and development of the Ahmadiyya. Movement?. These are but only a few examples of the inveracity of these hostile authors but when these anti Ahmadiyya publications are investigated at depth, one finds these to be filled to the brim with concocted quotations and fraudulent references attributed to Ahmadi Muslims and Ahmadiyya. Muslim publications. . QUOTATIONS AND REFERENCES FROM HOSTILE SOURCES. Justice demands that a charge brought against a person be sustained through conclusive evidence and nobility' requires that the validity of every unsubstantiated allegation against a person be rejected, particularly when such an imputation is being made by someone who is known to be a prejudiced witness. . However, the mendacious anti Ahmadiyya mullah clique of this day and age has not yet risen to that level of civilized conduct where it could be expected to grasp the importance of such civilized behaviour. . Otherwise, these mullahs would have ignored their personal prejudices and refrained from mischieviously seeking to substantiate their false allegations on the authority of prejudiced imputations made by some other hostile critics of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. . The adversaries of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community have been at pains to establish that its leadership misappropriated community funds¹ and lived extravagant lives of unprecendented luxury. 13 And, to 11. Ibid: pg 209 13. Ibid: pg 27 12. Zaheer E. E: Qadivaniat. An Analytical Survey: pg 240 96