Ahmadiyyat or Qadianism! Islam or Apostasy? — Page 87
CONTEMPT FOR THIS FICTITIOUS CHRISTIAN DEITY. Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian alluded to this fictitious Jesus and declared: 'The Jesus who is presented by Christians, who claimed to be God and who condemned everyone except himself, both those who had gone before him and those who were to come after him as accursed and as having been guilty of vices, the recompense of which is a curse, is regarded by us as deprived of Divine mercy. The Holy Quran makes no reference to this impertinent and foul mouthed Jesus. '18. AN ABSURD FACADE. Ironically, this foul mouthed and impertinent, albeit fictitious Jesus of the Scriptures appears to have been a subject of passionate controversy within the Islamic Ummah. Although the adversaries of the Ahmadiyya. Muslim Community do not deny the fact that he never existed as a reality, yet Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's opponents often accuse him of being particularly inimical to the son of Mary and allege that he challenged his piety and defiled his character. . To prove this concocted and baseless charge, these adversaries offer several contorted and misrepresented quotations from his books without any regard whatsoever to the either the expressed or the implied significance or purport of his statements. . It is for instance alleged that in his book Anjam i Atham, Hazrat Mirza. Ghulam Ahmad, God forbid, 'denounced Jesus's grandmothers as immoral adulteresses and accused him of being born of impure blood as a result of which he showed inclination towards prostitutes and even allowed them to message his feet with perfume bought of ill gotten wealth. '19. However, had these guileful critics reported Hazrat Mirza Ghulam. Ahmad's actual statement in its proper perspective, their readers may 18. Nurul Haq No 2 19. Zaheer, E:E: Qadiyaniat. An Analytical Survey: pg 76 87