Ahmadiyyat or Qadianism! Islam or Apostasy?

by Naeem Osman Memon

Page 332 of 415

Ahmadiyyat or Qadianism! Islam or Apostasy? — Page 332

Whatever be the merits of this allegation against the Shi'ite Muslims, the fact remains that the Shi'ite schools of thought reject the validity of the Sihah Sitta and they judge the Hadith from their own singular point of view. The Sunnis on the other hand reject the collection of Shi'ite. Hadith. Infact, the literature produced by the anti Ahmadiyya organisations itself admits that: 'The jurisprudence of the Sunni differs from that of the Shi'ites even in the fundamentals upon which the law is based. Infact, it is not merely in fundamentals of jurisprudence that there are differences, but more importantly, in the fundamental articles of faith of each party, even in their deepest roots. '8. And hence, as a consequence of this acute difference between the fundamental articles of the faith of the Sunni and the Shi'ite Muslims, it has been asserted that: 'there can be no reconciliation nor unificiation of the Sunni and the schismatic Shi'ites. "". The disunity between the Sunni and the Shi'ite schools of thought however is not the extent to which this Ummah stands divided. It is a fact of history that the Muslims have, for many centuries now, never been able to tolerate other Muslims on account of their difference in opinion. The adversaries of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, may continue to console themselves with the belief that although: 'Muslim society has been a victim to the disease of mutual accusations of heresy among the various sects'¹º yet they do continue to 'consider one another as Muslims. " '11. However, such false statements by the leaders of the anti. Ahmadiyya factions tend to expose the true nature of these mullahs who do not seem to tire of falsehood. Consider for instance the Fatwa issued against the Wahabbia Community, a Community 7. The Court of Inquiry Report: Government of Pakistan: pg 207 9. Ibid: pg 10 8. Khateeb, Muhibbudeen al: Al Khutiit al 'Areedh: pg 14 11. Ibid: pg 16 333