Ahmadiyyat or Qadianism! Islam or Apostasy? — Page 46
blood and these sentiments are shared by the entire Muslim populace of India. '56. In view of this common and universal opinion held and expressed by the Muslim leadership in India, one fails to understand as to what justifiable reason the critics of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community could have in their singular denunciation of Hazrat of Hazrat Mirza. Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian. If, by virtue of his appreciation of the British. Government's assistance and beneficence to the Muslim masses in India. he is, God forbid, considered a protege of the British Raj and a scion planted by the Imperial Government, then why are all the other Muslim organisations and leaders who expressed similar appreciation of the. British not also considered to be the proteges and scions of the colonial government? Do the critics of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community have any justification for this singular denunciation of one individual? Or does their pseudo Islamic sense of justice permit them such injustice and bias?. ALLEGED BRITISH SPONSORSHIP OF AHMADIS. Since the fabricators of these lies against the Ahmadiyya Muslim. Community have not been able to sustain their false allegations with any conclusive proofs, they proceed to prove their concoctions by arguing that: 'During the reign in India, the British placed Ahmadis in high public offices, gave liberal stipends to their children and provided them with all possible facilities and conveniences. '57. The contentious critics of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community also allege that through this sponsorship of the British: 'Qadiani students were sent to Europe to pursue studies. They were granted special rights in trade, agriculture, industry etc. '58. 56. Ibid: November 23, 1911 57. Zaheer, E. E: Qadiyaniat. An Analytical Survey: pg 6 58. Ibid: pg 36 46