Are Ahmadis Not True Muslims? — Page 55
? 55 Wal i H asan Tonk i and Muhammad Binor i wrote the following against the Pervaiz i s: Ghul a m Ahmad Pervez is a k a fir according to the faith of Mu h ammad, and he is outside the pale of Islam. Neither a Muslim woman can remain in valid marriage with him, nor can any Muslim woman now marry him. Neither will his funeral prayers be held, nor shall it be legitimate to bury him in a Muslim graveyard. This decision is not only applicable to Pervez but to all the disbelievers. It would also apply to every one of his followers who subscribes to the disbelief entertained by him. Since he is affirmed as an apostate, it is thus illegitimate, according to Islamic law, to retain any kind of Islamic affiliation with him. (Wal i H asan Tonk i , Muft i wa Mudarris, and Muhammad Y u suf Binor i Shaikhul- H ad i th, Madrasah ‘Arabiyyah, Islamiyyah Town, Karachi) Here are some quotes of non-Shiah Muslim ulema directed against Shiah Muslims. The definitive, unequivocal decree by general consensus against these R a fi di s and Tabarr a ’ i s is that they are, in general, disbelievers and apostates. An animal slaughtered by them is carrion. Inter-marriage with them is not just unlawful, it is unmitigated adultery. God forbid, if the man is a R a fi di and the woman is Muslim, that would be an instance of the utmost wrath of God. If the man is a Sunn i, and the woman belongs to these